Вестник СИБИТА № 2(18)

101 / 160

__________Вестник Сибирского института бизнеса и информационных технологий. 2016. № 2(18)__________
100
12. Шейфер , С.А. Доказательства и доказывание по уголовным делам: проблемы теории и правового ре-
гулирования [Текст]. – М.: Норма, 2009. – 312 с.
References
1. Bulgakov V.G. Osnovy kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya dinamicheskikh priznakov cheloveka. Mono-
grafiya [The basics of forensic investigation of dynamic characteristics of humans: Monograph]. Moskow, 2009, 252 p.
2. Veshchestvennye dokazatelstva. Informatsionnye tekhologii protsealnogo dokazyvaniya [Evidence:
Information technology procedure evidence]. Moskow, 2002, 487 p.
3. Kostenko R.V. Dokazatelstva v ugolovnom protsese (kontseptualnye podkhody I perspektivy pravovogo
regulirovaniya) [Evidence in criminal proceedings (conceptual approaches and perspectives of legal regulation].
Krasnodar, 2006, 387 p.
4. Leibin B. Slovar’-spravochnik po psikhoanalisu [The dictionary of psychoanalysis]. Moskow, 2010. 272 p.
5. Tagarov Filosofskoe opredelenie informatsii, privedennoe v issledovanii Nizhegorodtseva [Philosophi-
cal definition of information given in the study nizhegorodtseva]. URL:
10-17-01-50-08.html.
6. Chulakhov V.N. kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie navykov i privychek cheloveka [Forensic investigation
skills and habits of the person]. Moskow, 2004, 196 p.
7. Sheifer S.A. Dokazatelstva I dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii I pravovogo regulirovaniya
[Evidence and proof in criminal cases: problems of theory and legal regulations]. Moskow, 2004, 312 p.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ARTICLE 81 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION:
EPISTEMOLOGICAL AND TERMINOLOGICAL ERRORS IN THE TITLE AND THE CONTENT
Nikolay A. Ivanov,
Associate Professor, Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies
Abstract. The paper argues the need to change the title of article 81 of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian
Federation «material evidence» to « material objects», and also argued that «physical objects» means the objects of bio-
logical sources, as well as the inanimate objects of the natural and artificial sources.
Keywords: criminal procedure, evidence, material evidence, material objects, gun crime, documents.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Сведения об авторе:
Иванов Николай Анатольевич – кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры уголовно-правовых дис-
циплин Сибирского института бизнеса и информационных технологий (г. Омск , Российская Федерация), e-mail:
.
Статья поступила в редакцию 10.03.2016.